PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock B460M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200831 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | Mar 02 '21 at 09:14 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-10400F-$151
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
89% 154 Pts
|
81% 634 Pts
|
64% 954 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
|
35.2%
Below average
|
36% 42.3 fps
|
34% 36.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$25
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 125 118 81 97 75 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
59% 264 MB/s
|
109% 44.4 MB/s
|
177% 259 MB/s
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2012)-$70
719GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 92 94 94 93 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
61% 82.7 MB/s
|
163% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
125GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 128 130 130 130 MB/s
|
73.1%
Very good
|
73% 100 MB/s
|
140% 0.9 MB/s
|
|
![]() USB Flash DISK 64GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.5 8.5 8.1 8.1 9.1 MB/s
|
8.31%
Terrible
|
23% 17.2 MB/s
|
75% 1.87 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.7%
Good
|
68% 23.6 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
62% 64.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $151Bench 88%, 45,852 samples | 546x |
Core i5-10400Intel $150Bench 89%, 28,723 samples | 354x |
Core i3-10100Intel $136Bench 84%, 11,731 samples | 171x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 210,702 samples | 155x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $338Bench 89%, 366,438 samples | 103x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 8,339 samples | 99x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $552 |