Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 07:06
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 918
85% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,333
82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 66.5
56% 69.2 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 64
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2053 2138 1517 1475 1479 1489 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,352
Mixed 1,885
SusWrite 1,692
476% 2,119 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 81.2
266% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 918
665% 869 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 326%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
416GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 483 483 484 436 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 484
Mixed 462
SusWrite 436
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 54.2
181% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 483 483 484 483 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 433
SusWrite 476
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 52.7
176% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 144 144 145 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 142
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
598GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 96.2
Write 96.1
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 101
109% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 36.9
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 32.2
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback