Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 02:13
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 764
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 97.6
Parallax 89.1
80% 95 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 91
Splatting 78.1
72% 89 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 192 184 190 173 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 196
Mixed 237
SusWrite 187
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 36.8
160% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 191
166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
181GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1530 1239 1252 1240 1247 1244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
362GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 120 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 166
Write 126
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 121
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
527GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 82 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 83.1
Write 84
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 81.5
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
810GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 109
120% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43
76GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 358 320 313 357 365 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback