PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Boot Drive | 13.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-S (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090717 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 01 '21 at 23:49 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 104 124 134 125 123 MB/s
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 3 3.1 3.1 2.7 MB/s
|
3.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X2 240AMDBench 40%, 5,506 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 4x |
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 8x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |