PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201014 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 01 '21 at 22:19 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1858 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 189 22 90 62 12 MB/s
|
61.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 219 217 216 218 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $648 |