Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 375 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Memory 14.9 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 31.5 12% 20.8 Pts	4-Core 60.1 8-Core 68.5 8% 64.3 Pts	64-Core 49.7 3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.43 fps	MRender 0.7 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.6 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shiji 128GB 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 129 174 181 176 200 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 92.3 Write 192 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 175 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 6.5 26% 9.73 MB/s	DQ Read 65.1 DQ Write 82.1 DQ Mixed 25.8 33% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 361 11% 361 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x

SSD
V800/1TB 1TBVasekyBench 90%, 2 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16