Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 18.7
2-Core 6.9
24% 27 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 140
10% 89.3 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 51.5
47% 55.7 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 51.1
42% 54.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 121 92 98 91 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 412
Write 385
Mixed 317
SusWrite 115
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 29.7
98% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 164
136% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 118%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$190
64GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 217 214 186 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 338
Write 267
Mixed 270
SusWrite 174
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 23.4
79% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 213
160% 215 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 91%
Adata SP900 256GB-$190
57GB free
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 142 166 165 130 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 344
Write 246
Mixed 238
SusWrite 143
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 23.3
82% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 94.8
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 163
118% 149 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MK1059GS 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: GU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 106 104 74 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
40GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.4 14 15 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 16
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 13.6
23% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
120% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 1.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $175Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $220Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback