Asus G20CB

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G20CB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G20CB
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150828
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '21 at 07:27
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 231 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 626 62% 509 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.6% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 83 Parallax 73.7 58% 75.8 fps	MRender 77.2 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 64.7 57% 70.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 76 70 64 70 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 428 Write 104 Mixed 246 SusWrite 81.5 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 17.3 73% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 23.3 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 130GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 86 81 87 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 51 Write 99.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 85.5 47% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 107%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 464 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7 7 6.9 6.5 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 6.6 9% 7.08 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 9%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 361GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 39 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 10.6 39% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 43%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 208GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 228 208 195 186 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 218 Write 215 Mixed 152 SusWrite 204 266% 197 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 21.6 1,685% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 36.7 DQ Mixed 25.2 2,182% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 167%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 113GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 34.6 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 10.3 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 42%
ST500LM0 00-1EJ162 500GB 69GB free, PID 0420 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 11 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.6% Poor	Read 41.1 Write 40.4 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 10.4 40% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 2.3 MB/s

Wilk GOODRAM 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.6 4.5 4.6 3.7 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 3 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 4.1 6% 5.12 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.9% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23.5 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	829x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	121x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	252x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	201x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	113x

SSD
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	91x
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	75x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	29x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	341x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	162x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	97x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16