Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 892 88% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,126 70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 113 Parallax 117 102% 118 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 107 Splatting 98.2 91% 114 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 485 322 298 298 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 462 Mixed 420 SusWrite 364 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 65.1 220% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 225GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 89 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 87.3 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 90.3 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 3,571 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23.2 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 27.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,612x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,215x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	829x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	295x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	360x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16