HP Pavilion dv9500 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion dv9500 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30D1
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 16:45
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-58
Socket S1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 43.4
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 43.6
25% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 46.4
8-Core 43.9
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M
HP(103C 30CF) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 12.2
Mixed 23.4
30% 144 MB/s
4K Read 97.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.8
152% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 0.8
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dv9500 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv9500 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback