| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H55M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100806 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 19 '17 at 16:42 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
65% 105 Pts
|
39% 315 Pts
|
23% 373 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
|
55.1%
Above average
|
57% 67.4 fps
|
52% 64.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
52.8%
Above average
|
48% 217 MB/s
|
89% 31 MB/s
|
28% 48.4 MB/s
|
|
|
54.6%
Above average
|
52% 71.6 MB/s
|
99% 1.11 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
42.2%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
68% 58.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H55M Builds (Compare 30 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H55M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 8x |
| Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |