MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 176
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 503
47% 393 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 48
Parallax 43.3
38% 45.8 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 43.9
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 95 57 55 53 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 236
Write 179
Mixed 165
SusWrite 69
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 14.7
66% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 157
117% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
60GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 219 216 217 218 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 387
Write 338
Mixed 223
SusWrite 226
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 27.1
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 164
166% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
70GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 353 312 302 287 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 376
Mixed 327
SusWrite 311
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 36.9
128% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
257GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 89 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 50
SusWrite 87.9
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $601
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback