MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 11:39
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 762
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 972
60% 972 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 141
Parallax 129
105% 133 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1253 981 972 979 964 978 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1980
Write 2,206
Mixed 1731
SusWrite 1,021
390% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 71.1
246% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 898
687% 938 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 260%
Great: 297%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
119GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 144 141 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 424
Write 161
Mixed 215
SusWrite 144
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 132
112% 164 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
469GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 120
Mixed 103
SusWrite 115
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
919GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 110 109 109 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 110
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.5 2.9 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Read 32
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.3
11% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.5
103% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 32.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback