AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 11:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 15.9
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 89.5
26% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 90.5
12% 89.3 Pts
64-Core 88.3
6% 88.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD256GBS800 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 282 290 294 298 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 326
Write 287
Mixed 288
SusWrite 294
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 11.6
48% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 84.8
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 51.9
45% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 352
11% 352 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback