Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '21 at 00:39
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$201 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 79.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 95% 178 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 1,006 94% 780 Pts	64-Core 1573 97% 1573 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87AF) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.8% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 59.8 49% 59.8 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 59.8 49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 336 324 317 308 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,296 Write 497 Mixed 647 SusWrite 340 153% 695 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 63.8 215% 78.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,007 DQ Write 749 DQ Mixed 969 700% 908 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 363%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2547 2553 2551 1665 1530 1539 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	370% Outstanding	Read 2,620 Write 2,529 Mixed 2064 SusWrite 2,064 522% 2,319 MB/s	4K Read 64.2 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 90.5 299% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 1,044 DQ Mixed 962 744% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 370% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 25.5 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 28.6 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 131%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	706x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	420x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	432x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,733

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16