Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 18:15
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$286
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 155
2-Core 285
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,152
105% 879 Pts
64-Core 2,098
130% 2,098 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 179
Parallax 184
146% 180 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 159
Splatting 132
130% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 9.3
5% 8.73 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
223GB free
Firmware: SAFC11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 90 99 107 95 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 512
Write 438
Mixed 357
SusWrite 116
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 36.7
138% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 135
119% 185 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 97%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2529 2557 2562 2559 2565 2565 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 1949
Write 2,410
Mixed 1,820
SusWrite 2,556
494% 2,184 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 57.9
198% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,109
833% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 345%
Great: 496%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
838GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 486 484 486 485 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 485
Mixed 429
SusWrite 485
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 45.4
157% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
0GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 161
Mixed 90.3
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD My Book 1TB
151GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 35.9
Write 35.3
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 41.4
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2K4000C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 34.3
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 33.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 8,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,273
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback