Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 191 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 366 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(7377 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.7 4% 2.73 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 180 217 191 183 223 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 387 Write 280 Mixed 284 SusWrite 200 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 37.4 132% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 146 140% 220 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 91%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 238GB free Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 298 299 303 303 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 383 Write 265 Mixed 327 SusWrite 301 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 59.2 194% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 551 357% 416 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 249%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 238GB free Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1235 315 316 316 316 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2195 Write 1,586 Mixed 1,383 SusWrite 469 313% 1,408 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 66.9 221% 75.7 MB/s	DQ Read 708 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 553 432% 597 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 249%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 16GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 31 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	422x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16