Lenovo F0E800NBRK

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo F0E800NBRK (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 370C
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 12:18
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	24%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 71 1-Core 107 2-Core 223 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 324 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 370C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 6.6 5% 5.5 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 8 Splatting 0.1 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB 5,615 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0Q0628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 698 354 360 364 362 363 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 1,726 Write 1,224 Mixed 1,139 SusWrite 417 251% 1,127 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 78 267% 95.8 MB/s	DQ Read 705 DQ Write 747 DQ Mixed 320 353% 591 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 210%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: LFM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 125 129 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 118 Write 117 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 129 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 3,193 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 13GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 4.7 3.5 2.7 3.5 4.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Read 10.3 Write 2 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 3.4 6% 5.55 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB 16,227 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 12.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo F0E800NBRK

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)