Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 18:01
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 146 2-Core 285 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 789 80% 649 Pts	64-Core 1,045 65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 126 Parallax 190 96% 145 fps	MRender 97.9 Gravity 114 Splatting 82.7 79% 98.2 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,658 Write 2,044 Mixed 1891 488% 2,198 MB/s	4K Read 68.9 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 91.9 311% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,217 DQ Write 1,008 DQ Mixed 1,118 836% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 25GB free Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 184 144 46 111 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 482 Write 332 Mixed 228 SusWrite 129 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 35.8 137% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 155 128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 101%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 883GB free Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1418 1416 1425 1412 1424 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 1,857 Write 1,412 Mixed 1,272 SusWrite 1,420 334% 1,490 MB/s	4K Read 64.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 88.7 298% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,067 DQ Write 806 DQ Mixed 436 462% 770 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 311%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 45 45 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 43 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 45 30% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 210GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 57 60 59 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 70.9 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 60.9 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 67%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 35GB free Firmware: CT100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 71 71 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 59.2 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 70.2 43% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 42%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 680GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 92 96 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 95.9 Write 96.3 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 93.8 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 561GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 85 84 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 84.1 Write 76.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 83.3 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 28.6 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 27.3 64% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	354x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	325x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	284x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	154x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	129x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	113x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	162x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	142x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	95x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $917

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16