Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 94.1 1-Core 137 2-Core 252 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 1,039 97% 806 Pts	64-Core 1,494 92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% MSI(1462 3411) CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Lighting 63 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 78.5 51% 67.1 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 43.4 43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AN3 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB 744 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 843GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42A7T36A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2000 2136 2117 2168 1387 862 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,472 Write 2028 Mixed 1388 SusWrite 1,778 429% 1,916 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 69 224% 76.7 MB/s	DQ Read 44.8 DQ Write 391 DQ Mixed 408 259% 281 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 377%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 9GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 479 Write 230 Mixed 375 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 35.7 124% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 119 129% 209 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 95%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 63 62 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 49.8 Write 11.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 62.4 28% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 71%
SABRENT 1TB 225GB free Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 576 729 791 766 740 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 710GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 138 141 142 141 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 130 Write 116 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 138 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,365 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 21.2 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 21.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)