Tarox Basic 5261BM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemTarox Basic 5261BM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 373
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 60.8
44% 63.4 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 53.1
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 92 90 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 12
Write 52.3
Mixed 24
SusWrite 88.3
32% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 88%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
167GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 99
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 85
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
ASMT 2105 1TB
545GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 189 188 188 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 16.3
Write 18.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 176
101% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
930GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 132 132 133 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 55.5
Write 110
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 131
128% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback