Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 5405U 963 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 128 48% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 189 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 3.4 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 6.9 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB 4,082 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 149 150 144 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 473 Write 139 Mixed 265 SusWrite 142 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 21.4 93% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 206 155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GB 4,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	48x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	17x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	16x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2 1TBSamsungBench 281%, 13,997 samples	14x
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	10x

RAM
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GBRamaxelBench 43%, 3,986 samples	15x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	10x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16