Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210115
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 229 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 743 72% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,164 72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.1% Good	Lighting 80.5 Reflection 83.6 Parallax 76.3 66% 80.1 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 85.1 Splatting 78.9 64% 77.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 103 643 117 416 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,545 Write 1,549 Mixed 1,220 SusWrite 272 256% 1,147 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 64.4 213% 72 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 702 DQ Mixed 326 373% 642 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 273GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 421 417 441 423 346 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 426 Mixed 411 SusWrite 401 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 38.6 144% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 129%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 105GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 392 389 412 396 385 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 442 Write 403 Mixed 388 SusWrite 385 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 25.8 114% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 48.1 103% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 112GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 126 126 124 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 340 Mixed 336 SusWrite 159 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 43.6 153% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 171 183% 303 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 206GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 122 119 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 154 Write 147 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 121 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 109%
USB DISK Pro 16GB 380 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 10GB free, PID 4123 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.5 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.7 5% 5.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C14-8GFX CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C14-8GFX 32GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.8% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 28.7 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 18.8 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $80Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16