| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 24 '21 at 16:03 |
| Run Duration | 81 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.5%
Good
|
70% 124 Pts
|
53% 434 Pts
|
46% 736 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.8%
Average
|
46% 63.7 fps
|
43% 54 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
84% 376 MB/s
|
145% 50.3 MB/s
|
76% 176 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown U008GPC4E3000C 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.2%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
45% 88.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,850 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 478x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 386x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $310 |