MEI G Series

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MEI G Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock FM2A88X Extreme6+
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '21 at 14:50
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 111 53% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1233 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 73.6 44% 61.4 fps	MRender 57.7 Gravity 56.9 Splatting 41.4 42% 52 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0317A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 387 231 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 456 Write 390 Mixed 342 SusWrite 168 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 28.7 91% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 50.1 72% 131 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 228GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 164 Write 123 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 112 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 156GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 144 133 146 145 145 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 172 Write 165 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 141 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.2% Below average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 15.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.3 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G Series Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: MEI G Series

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	2x

GPU
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	1x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16