Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$42 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 89 2-Core 156 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 196 30% 219 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18E7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 4.5 2% 3.3 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 6 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 847GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 156 Write 74.9 Mixed 60.4 72% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030MN68F9F1600 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	982x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	331x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	224x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	52x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	40x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	26x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $141

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16