Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '21 at 05:39
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 53.2 32% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 164 16% 134 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.7 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 655 642 641 617 606 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 752 Write 741 Mixed 699 SusWrite 664 161% 714 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 33.3 112% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 231 171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 296%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB 7,927 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 1.5TB free Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 391 386 395 395 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 410 Write 400 Mixed 332 SusWrite 391 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 24.3 85% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 189 143% 193 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 17.2 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 6.1 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16