PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C91 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201029 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 24 '21 at 00:30 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
90.2%
Outstanding
|
92% 163 Pts
|
83% 652 Pts
|
74% 1,096 Pts
|
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.5%
Below average
|
30% 39 fps
|
31% 34.7 fps
|
|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-$128
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
26% 33.1 fps
|
27% 31.2 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
90% 31.6 GB/s
|
80% 28.1 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $350Bench 97%, 68,061 samples | 1,200x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $330Bench 87%, 493,054 samples | 1,175x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $200Bench 85%, 740,179 samples | 1,136x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 153%, 132,192 samples | 976x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 205%, 109,907 samples | 451x |
RX 5700-XTAMD $400Bench 107%, 296,727 samples | 403x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $1,284 |