MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 722
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,071
72% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$128
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 30.4
24% 30.8 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 22.4
27% 30.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 597 505 309 262 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 788
Mixed 102
SusWrite 413
142% 648 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 38.2
140% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 150
143% 236 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 132%
Great: 232%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
626GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1688 1001 1012 873 957 852 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,784
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 1,064
316% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 37.3
126% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 148
140% 231 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 170%
Great: 357%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 158 169 172 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 154
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 162
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 102%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
489GB free
Firmware: 07.00K07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 86 86 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 86.8
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 82.2
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 77%
5BAY H/W RAID5 16TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 176 194 200 215 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
Read 49.9
Write 88.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 189
129% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 0.63 MB/s
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
443GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 92 99 99 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 57
SusWrite 95.2
119% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 10,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $759
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback