Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$330
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 913
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,388
93% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$450
HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 104
Reflection 153
Parallax 97.4
84% 118 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 126
Splatting 111
100% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$53
236GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 438 436 439 440 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 205
Mixed 344
SusWrite 437
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 37.1
139% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 144
119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 102%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$130
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 192 190 200 196 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,051
Write 656
Mixed 423
SusWrite 198
128% 582 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 37.9
159% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 377
340% 518 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 128%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$62
435GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 71 73 71 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 71
Write 73.1
Mixed 35
SusWrite 66.9
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
156GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 140 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 140
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 082A 2TB
353GB free, PID 082a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 38.6
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 38
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 31.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 25.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 18,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,179
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback