HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-06xx

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 days ago, 11 days ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-06xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 843B
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$172 246,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 85% 146 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 660 67% 531 Pts	64-Core 636 43% 636 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155 727,464 User benchmarks, average bench 31% HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.8% Below average	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 38.6 30% 39.4 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 28 31% 35.1 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$105 397,638 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 750GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 444 456 458 462 460 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 461 Mixed 427 SusWrite 455 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 45.1 146% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 321 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Intel Optane+1.8TBHDD 123 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1.5TB free Firmware: 16.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 169 169 175 170 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 91%
WD Elements 1TB 42,216 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 931GB free, PID 10a8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 86 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 88.4 Write 89.7 Mixed 51 SusWrite 87 106% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43TB1-CTD 1x8GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.3 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-06xx Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-06xx

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $172Bench 85%, 246,117 samples	4x
Core i7-9700FIntel $250Bench 94%, 28,962 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 727,464 samples	6x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 117%, 19,329 samples	2x
Optane+1.8TBHDDIntelBench 68%, 123 samples	1x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 2,240 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 3,074 samples	2x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 7,443 samples	2x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GBHynixBench 65%, 25 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $327

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $320	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16