Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 920
90% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,371
85% 1,371 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 154
Parallax 98.2
82% 118 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 125
Splatting 110
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
236GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 440 435 434 441 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 240
Mixed 346
SusWrite 436
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 37.4
140% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 144
119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 102%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 206 186 176 200 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,057
Write 453
Mixed 291
SusWrite 190
109% 498 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 44.3
183% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 376
339% 517 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 135%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
435GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 66 71 73 71 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 79.7
Write 59
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 65.3
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
156GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 140 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 139
Write 108
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 140
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 082A 2TB
353GB free, PID 082a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 38
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 38
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.3% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 31.3
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 34.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback