PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170710 |
Uptime | 4.7 Days |
Run Date | Feb 23 '21 at 17:26 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
71.1%
Very good
|
73% 123 Pts
|
48% 349 Pts
|
24% 353 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.5%
Above average
|
54% 71.8 fps
|
55% 58.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 51 57 57 54 57 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
60% 274 MB/s
|
162% 55.8 MB/s
|
267% 357 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
421GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 5.2 10 10 8.6 MB/s
|
||||
![]() WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
767GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 8.5 9.8 7.4 7.8 6.9 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67%
Good
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $189Bench 72%, 187,839 samples | 1,675x |
Core i7-7700Intel $327Bench 80%, 196,546 samples | 897x |
Core i5-7500Intel $198Bench 76%, 114,288 samples | 844x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,090,662 samples | 641x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 727,464 samples | 630x |
RX 580AMD $220Bench 55%, 661,819 samples | 563x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $653 |