MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

1 month ago, 29 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 2340 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$280 215,510 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 736 73% 579 Pts	64-Core 979 66% 979 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 93%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 53,741 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 7.3 2 143 64 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 347 Write 381 Mixed 303 SusWrite 86.8 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 19.9 59% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 57%
Seagate ST9120315AS 120GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 111GB free Firmware: 0002CE02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 75.1 Write 68 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 72.2 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38 2,294,735 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 481GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 159 159 159 159 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 151 Write 142 Mixed 92.2 SusWrite 158 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 108%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 1,914 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 19.4 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 17.8 31% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3 206% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$79 440,338 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.6% Good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 27.3 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $200Bench 84%, 762,656 samples	435x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $330Bench 87%, 469,549 samples	321x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $280Bench 85%, 215,510 samples	182x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 385,314 samples	171x
RX 5700-XTAMD $400Bench 107%, 316,461 samples	143x
RX 580AMD $220Bench 55%, 661,819 samples	84x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 288%, 250,610 samples	84x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $70Bench 271%, 339,151 samples	57x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $110Bench 92%, 117,229 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 84%, 440,338 samples	143x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 145,127 samples	88x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $114Bench 85%, 195,906 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $869

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $327	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16