Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 174 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 289 34% 261 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PNY(196E 0984) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.7% Poor	Lighting 29.3 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 37.6 24% 32.9 fps	MRender 40.2 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 31.4 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 96 97 90 94 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 144 Write 115 Mixed 125 SusWrite 92.2 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 15.6 53% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 98.6 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 84.4 68% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CT51272BA1067.M18F Kingston KP223C-ELD 6GB 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	21x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $507

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16