| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130416 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 23 '21 at 15:12 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
54% 89.7 Pts
|
39% 315 Pts
|
25% 402 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.51
|
46.7%
Average
|
48% 57.6 fps
|
45% 55.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 261 64 56 57 25 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
76% 341 MB/s
|
42% 10.9 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
664GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 110 106 109 110 108 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
68% 93.5 MB/s
|
173% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
424GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 171 150 170 172 172 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
100% 137 MB/s
|
146% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
44.2%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
53% 75.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 13x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 11x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |