HP ProBook 6550b

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
23 days ago, 1 day ago.
SystemHP ProBook 6550b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 146D
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 117
48% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 152
22% 157 Pts
64-Core 162
11% 162 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$25
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 140 140 141 140 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 197
Write 125
Mixed 124
SusWrite 152
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 12.7
50% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 30.7
25% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
10GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.9 5.6 5.3 5.6 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 5.3
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.3
137% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProBook 6550b Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6550b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10400F $151Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $228Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $325Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback