Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170 2,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 39 2-Core 68.6 40% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 77.5 8-Core 77.7 10% 77.6 Pts	64-Core 66.3 4% 66.3 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2127) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 4.1 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MMCRE64G8MPP-0VA 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM08L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 59 67 65 67 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 37%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 595GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 86 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 82.7 Write 84 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 83.6 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16