Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 787
74% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.9% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 56.5
36% 45 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 23.4
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,476
Write 867
Mixed 434
202% 926 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 40.4
185% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,147
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 835
672% 951 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
35GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,693
Write 1,400
Mixed 489
263% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 50.5
199% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1076
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 765
645% 938 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 298 297 297 296 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 451
Mixed 366
SusWrite 315
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 48.2
161% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
724GB free
Firmware: 02.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 83.7
Write 94
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 75.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 31.6
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback