Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200 37,394 User benchmarks, average bench 96% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 90.2 1-Core 162 2-Core 324 104% 192 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 1,087 104% 856 Pts	64-Core 1,700 105% 1,700 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.39 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 53.5 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 57.7 44% 58.8 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 55 Splatting 51.1 46% 57 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 54%
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.39 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 27.9 25% 29.9 fps	MRender 26.3 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 25.8 22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB 5,553 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 651 635 630 633 635 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,054 Write 968 Mixed 1,032 SusWrite 638 208% 923 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 69.3 230% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 781 DQ Write 769 DQ Mixed 671 533% 741 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 203%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB 4,401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2.5TB free Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 179 182 183 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 183 Write 175 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 181 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.47 MB/s	DQ Read 1.4 DQ Write 8.2 DQ Mixed 1.7 2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 20%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 186 179 187 183 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 183 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 183 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.C8FE 2x16GB 627 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 21.7 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 25.1 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 142%

UFO

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	664x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	450x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	345x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	924x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	541x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	305x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $965

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16