PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190813 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '21 at 15:00 |
Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 73 130 127 119 131 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.2%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,165x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $107Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 675x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 211x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 299x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 205x |
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 203x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $366 |