Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 88.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 278 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 770 72% 601 Pts	64-Core 782 48% 782 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	52.4% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 61.6 52% 64.1 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 60.7 52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 349 347 352 346 342 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 466 Mixed 298 SusWrite 348 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 37.9 144% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 256 218% 319 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 33GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 99 83 81 79 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.6% Above average	Read 216 Write 122 Mixed 177 SusWrite 87.7 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 32.2 120% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 85.4 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 98.7 76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 61GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 79 79 78 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 65.5 Write 64.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 77.9 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 87,241 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	64.3% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 20.7 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 104%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,418x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2,331x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	2,139x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1,219x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1,046x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	998x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,981x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1,456x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	960x

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $828

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16