HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 07:11
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 368
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Sapphire(174B 7162) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L1 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 147 148 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 471
Write 150
Mixed 188
SusWrite 147
52% 239 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 29
110% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 184
158% 240 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 88%
NE-128 128GB
109GB free
Firmware: T0707A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 316 314 318 171 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 360
Write 309
Mixed 299
SusWrite 250
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 19.8
105% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 193
159% 223 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 173%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
463GB free
Firmware: MS1OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 175 187 188 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 176
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 183
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 105%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 04EF Team-Elite-1600 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 04EF Team-Elite-1600 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback