Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 221 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 669 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 937 58% 937 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.07 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 98.4 Parallax 111 90% 107 fps	MRender 157 Gravity 112 Splatting 93.2 96% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 30,266 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80000C00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 844 Write 618 Mixed 653 157% 705 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 38.1 128% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 565 DQ Write 718 DQ Mixed 615 472% 633 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 916GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 182 182 183 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 180 Mixed 113 SusWrite 184 124% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	67% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 22 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 12.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16