Lenovo 20C5A05NSG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20C5A05NSG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5A05NSG
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 122
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 326
35% 277 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 502A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4281
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.7
3% 6.13 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 16 30 7.5 16 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 467
Write 368
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 48
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.9
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
13% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 16
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback