Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 15:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$360
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 269
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 794
81% 638 Pts
64-Core 981
66% 981 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$480
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 109
Parallax 120
96% 116 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 111
Splatting 101
97% 128 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 86 77 84 70 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 331
Write 286
Mixed 212
SusWrite 102
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 4.7
37% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 35.7
34% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 55%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
224GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 803 576 430 432 473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 1,198
Mixed 922
SusWrite 610
224% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 56.9
199% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 349
397% 670 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 187%
Great: 281%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 138 138 136 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 9.3
Write 21.6
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 136
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.3 9.8 9.5 7.9 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 9.7
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 9.5
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$98
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 22.3
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 3,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback