HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 03:18
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 827
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.93
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
128% 162 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 142
Splatting 0.3
76% 107 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 12 34 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 524
Write 38.5
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 20.2
32% 153 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 14.7
70% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 127
111% 175 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 147%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 179 186 183 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 112
Write 143
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 178
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 55 27 26 26 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 160
Write 63.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 36.3
92% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.1
187% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback