HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 187 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 318 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.6% Good	Lighting 79.8 Reflection 118 Parallax 80.4 65% 92.9 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 87.6 Splatting 89.5 72% 88.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 94 88 94 92 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 404 Write 109 Mixed 151 SusWrite 93.3 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 20.3 76% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 71.3 DQ Mixed 111 110% 187 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 87%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 855GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 173 250 300 284 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 407 Write 346 Mixed 356 SusWrite 269 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 27 100% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 107 107% 182 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GB 9,905 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 23.5 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 18.4 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX Builds (Compare 1,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	754x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	739x
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	669x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	545x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	40x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	70x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	311x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 5,278 samples	199x
HP24D4U7S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 895 samples	68x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16