Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 232
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 475
53% 419 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.3% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 86.5
72% 88.6 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 91.8
72% 87.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
482GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 366 382 412 404 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 385
Write 375
Mixed 349
SusWrite 371
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 38.7
124% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50.7
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 70.9
62% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 133%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 134 80 0.9 139 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 365
Write 373
Mixed 309
SusWrite 107
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 28.4
100% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 43.3
43% 65 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
822GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 125 128 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 113
Write 42.4
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 124
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 16.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback