| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 18 '21 at 17:58 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
78% 133 Pts
|
62% 506 Pts
|
39% 630 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
31% 37.7 fps
|
27% 33.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 95 120 112 99 117 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
38% 174 MB/s
|
123% 44.3 MB/s
|
132% 201 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
152GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 105 109 109 108 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
148% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.9%
Good
|
71% 24.7 GB/s
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
59% 68.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,065 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 313x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 142x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 123x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 108x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $542 |